← All checked meetingsRedline · May 20, 2024
Las Cruces Council Meeting - May 20, 2024
The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 77 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 76 were found in the recording.
Tracks the recording closely. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.
Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026
2 differences
Differences that ordinary summarising does not explain — words nobody said, figures and negations that disagree, vote rolls that don’t add up, and stretches where somebody spoke and went unrecorded. Show all 17 differences
~1040 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 1 person introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “contamination”, “condemnation”, “eviction”, “deportation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
uh the police department and the citizens who have gone through first aid in CPR training we appreciate you very much thank you you good thank you councelor Graham uh next we have the jobs of the week Sarah Rainey good afternoon everyone thank you mayor and Council my name is Sarah Rainey I am the onstop coordinator for the workforce Connections Office for the southwest region and for jobs of the week for this week we have a collection specialist for the city of Las cruus that position pays
~260 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 1 person introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “contamination”, “condemnation”, “deportation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
Christine this is on the motion to approve resolution 24-120 councelor McClair yes councelor matis yes councelor Graham yes councelor cran is absent councelor flutes yes councelor bomo yes and mayor yes next is 7.3 resolution number 24-1 121 a resolution adopting the municipal adopted budget for fiscal year 2425 for the city of Los cus move to approve Graham second good afternoon mayor council City management staff and public my name is jacn rubal Gava budgetting Grant administrator I am bringing forth a resolution today to adopt
Were you there?
If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.