Redline · March 9, 2026
Las Cruces Council Work Session - March 9, 2026
The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 43 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 43 were found in the recording.
Summarised — gaps worth reading. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.
Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026
Nothing serious flagged
Differences that ordinary summarising does not explain — words nobody said, figures and negations that disagree, vote rolls that don’t add up, and stretches where somebody spoke and went unrecorded. Show all 8 differences
Nothing here needs explaining beyond ordinary summarising — no invented words, no altered figures, no unrecorded speakers.
Were you there?
If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.