Perfect World
Las Cruces
← All checked meetings

Redline · February 23, 2026

Las Cruces Council Work Session - February 23, 2026

The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 41 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 41 were found in the recording.

Summarised — gaps worth reading. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.

79match score /100
7,154words in the minutes
19,910words on the recording
10,660spoken words with no counterpart

Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026

13 differences

Every difference the check found, including ones ordinary summarising explains. Show only the serious ones

“copper” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes

Word never written down

A word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

in but uh Dr. Deb Dennis, uh Patrick Lamb, Monica Guzman, uh Greg Smith, Jean Fulton, Peggy Smith, Phyllis Franzoy, um Dr. Dennis, Dr. Sonia Cooper, and Jean Fulton have worked tirelessly for two decades on this project. Um, this was the dream when we opened Main Street and I think many of you know

“lead” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes

Word never written down

A word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

group is based out of Southern California. Uh we have a core group of of four folks, but Teresa and I are the are the leads here in Los Cusus. And uh we have a number of years of of work in the field of police practices. We work do we do a lot of

“violate” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes

Word never written down

A word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

dispositive. So the investigation uh found uh in the department's occurrence that the allegation was exonerated, which means that it happened, but it did not violate policy. And in our review of the case, we found that it was maybe more appropriate to have found it to be not sustained, which means that there wasn't

“racist” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes

Word never written down

A word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

and thank you to the police department for cooperating with the u the review. I have a I have a a question and um a request. So, Viola or Christine um when will this be available for public review or consumption or will it be this report? Um Christina Viola would be Thank you. Mr

~2990 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “corrupt”, “resign”, “contamination”, “condemnation”, “eviction”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

Good afternoon. Uh, welcome to our work session. Today is Monday, February 23rd, 2026. It's approximately 100 p.m. I am Mayor Eric Enriquez. We'll start with a moment of silence. Yeah, if you'll join me in a moment of silence for our military personnel, our police and fire that protect us locally and to all our city employees that provide the service they do for our city. If you'll join me in the pledge. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to

Vote recorded for Michael Harris Mayor City Clerk, who the minutes do not list as present

Vote roll doesn't add up

The vote roll contradicts the same document's own attendance. Motion: adjourn at 2:59 p.m. The attendance roster and the vote roll of the same document disagree about who was in the room.

What the minutes say

adjourn at 2:59 p.m RESULT: Carried AYES: Johana Bencomo, Becky Corran, Eric Enriquez, Cassie McClure, William Mattiace, John Munoz, Michael Harris Mayor City Clerk

What the recording says

No matching passage found anywhere in the recording.

2 ADJOURNMENT 2.1 C

~650 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “resign”, “asbestos”, “deportation”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

u when when you'd like to say a few words. I know you've been a big advocate for it, and we appreciate it. So, we didn't start out, but we wanted to recognize you and say thank you for being here. And uh and we also have former counselor Greg Smith here, uh also a part. So, thank you for joining us. All right. Good afternoon again, mayor and council. Uh, Carol Brag, quality of life director for the record. Uh, and we are here to give you an update

~1820 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “lawsuit”, “resign”, “copper”, “contamination”, “asbestos”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

it to a a a good place in history where um we can really showcase the strong points of the building and how it was used by um the city. Uh different things that we could do within the the building that will reflect the uh um the history or we can have some of the a couple of the rooms could be changed into um period pieces to show what it looked like, what one of the rooms would look like. It'll actually uh have some um we can

~1170 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “lawsuit”, “litigation”, “investigation”, “misconduct”, “lead”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

give you a perspective of where we come from and then we'll dive into our semianual report and our findings 50/50 chance. There we go. Good afternoon everybody and and thank you for having us. Uh Steve Connley of OIR Group. Um and as Teresa said, we're we're very happy to be back in touch um in in Los Cusus uh for for one of our u periodic visits to your city. So particularly for the the u audience members or or uh our our new counselors, Mayor Prom, uh

“litigation” is said 5× on the recording and never appears in the minutes

Word never written down

A word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

work, I also just want to briefly touch on a couple of other things that are part of our scope. One of them being closed litigation. That's something that we also report on when a a case alleging um you know some sort of lawsuit claimer lawsuit against the city has made it through the

~260 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “lawsuit”, “misconduct”, “cancer”, “deportation”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

training? And it's conceivable that a particular incident could be legally justified and there's no criminal implications, but the department says you we have a a policy related concern and we're going to remediate the officer accordingly. So, uh, Teresa will talk about that case a little bit later in the presentation. Three of the incidents that we looked at involved offduty allegations of misconduct. And this is always a significant part of of uh I guess police accountability in the sense that that the the police officers are police

~2340 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “lawsuit”, “violation”, “violate”, “investigation”, “misconduct”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

done here and we want to forward this on for further investigation." So, internal affairs takes it from there and and we look at those cases. And then four cases, the the the other four had to do with a range of things that were more administrative in nature and a couple of cases involving investigative issues and and the effectiveness or thoroughess of investigative work that was being done by the department. Uh so along with the 12 internally generated cases, we had three cases that began as complaints

~1430 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “lawsuit”, “investigation”, “misconduct”, “contamination”, “cancer”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

determined that one of the things that that the department had initially been concerned about, the officer actually had a a a very plausible and persuasive justification for when he was interviewed a little bit more specifically and thoroughly. he provided some information that was was missing from their understanding and and they determined that he was exonerated for that piece of it. And then again, as we saw in in other cases, they that same case resulted in a a couple of sustained findings. One for officers related to

Were you there?

If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.