Corran: a negation on the recording is missing from the minutes (“not”)
Says something differentBoth records carry the same sentence, but they disagree on a number or on whether it was negative. The same sentence appears in both records, but the recording contains “not” where the minutes have nothing — which reverses its sense. Around: “multi-site animal permit if we cut this they could still register their house”.
What the minutes say
Councilor Corran asked if someone had a multi-site animal permit, if we cut this, they could still register their house as a multi-animal site permit? If we cut that it is not really functionally making a huge difference except it won’t be double assessed to people who have an enclosed colony.
What the recording says
a multi-anim animal site permit if that answers your question. So, if someone had a multi-anim animal side permit, they wouldn't if we cut this, that would not that they could still register their their cats as or their house as a multi-animal site permit regardless of that. So, if we cut that, it's not really functionally making a huge difference, except it won't be double assessed for people who have an enclosed cat colony. Absolutely. They would have they would need that multi-anim animal