← All checked meetingsRedline · August 4, 2025
Las Cruces Council Meeting - August 4th, 2025
The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 85 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 85 were found in the recording.
Tracks the recording closely. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.
Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026
3 differences
Differences that ordinary summarising does not explain — words nobody said, figures and negations that disagree, vote rolls that don’t add up, and stretches where somebody spoke and went unrecorded. Show all 14 differences
~2470 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 2 people introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “fraud”, “lead”, “contamination”, “cancer”, “condemnation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
Music] Thank you. Thank you, Mr. You're live. Good afternoon. Welcome to the city council meeting. Today is Monday, August 4th, 2025. It's approximately 100 p.m. I'm Mayor Eric Enriquez. Before we start, I want to mention that we have the American Sign Language interpreter up front. Thank you for being here. Uh they're available at every regular city council meeting. Uh we will start with a moment of silence for the brave men and women of the United States Armed Forces as they protect our interests around the
Souder: a negation on the recording is missing from the minutes (“don't”)
Says something differentBoth records carry the same sentence, but they disagree on a number or on whether it was negative. The same sentence appears in both records, but the recording contains “don't” where the minutes have nothing — which reverses its sense. Around: “arroyos are significantly away from them so as to prevent any kind of”.
What the minutes say
Souder, Miller and Associates said on the map before you, there are two primary arroyos that runs on this property. One on the very south and one that bisects the southern portion of the property. We have mapped those, taken those into account, prepared the flood study and the boundary lines that create those arroyos are significantly away from them so as to prevent any kind of flood damage in the future.
What the recording says
name Paul Pompio Solder Miller and Associates I just um on the map before you we did there are two primary royals that run this property one on the very south and one that biseects the southern portion of the property we have mapped those taken those into account prepared the flood studies and those the boundary lines that create those aairs are significantly away from them so we don't so as to prevent any kind of flood damage in the future so we're not significantly ly um not close to them. That I
Adolfo Cardenas: a negation on the recording is missing from the minutes (“don't”)
Says something differentBoth records carry the same sentence, but they disagree on a number or on whether it was negative. The same sentence appears in both records, but the recording contains “don't” where the minutes have nothing — which reverses its sense. Around: “as of june 30 2025 every investment that is in that”.
What the minutes say
Adolfo Cardenas said as of June 30, 2025, every investment that is in that fund is invested in the state investment council. The reason for that is because it is available.
What the recording says
I mean, don't we allocate monies to worthwhile um entities, nonprofits? Mayor, councelor Flores, uh like I said, as of June 30, 2025, we don't everything every investment that is in that fund is invested in the statement and the state investment council. The reason for that is because it's it's available. It's in it's available for budget for commitments. Uh so let's say
Were you there?
If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.