Perfect World
Las Cruces
← All checked meetings

Redline · February 24, 2025

Las Cruces Council Work Session - February 24, 2025

The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 18 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 17 were found in the recording.

Diverges from the recording. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.

73match score /100
3,794words in the minutes
13,196words on the recording
7,930spoken words with no counterpart

Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026

12 differences

Every difference the check found, including ones ordinary summarising explains. Show only the serious ones

~260 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

connley here and and happy to be back in in your city um I think at this point the the council members are and the city government is pretty familiar with us and our background but just to brief ly um provide some context oir group is a team of police practices experts we operate out of Southern California uh we have been doing this kind of work in a number of jurisdictions for more than 20 years now and we have a number of ongoing relationships with jurisdictions um

“violation” is said 2× on the recording and never appears in the minutes

Word never written down

A word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

thing here is that 63 of the 88 were sustained that means that the Department's investigation found that misconduct did occur um and was a violation of policy or procedure this number to us is telling in part because one of the things we want to see is a system of accountability that is effective

“harassment” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes

Word never written down

A word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

excuse me Mental Health crisis call that Steve spoke about earlier that involved the excessive use of force and the other involved allegations of workplace harassment both of those cases have since been settled by the city back to Steve so in terms of our function here obviously the auditing the close review of each

~780 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “contamination”, “condemnation”, “immigration”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

e e e [Music] you're live thank you good afternoon everyone today's Monday February 24th Welcome to our work session agenda uh before we begin our meeting today we will start with the Pledge of Allegiance if you can please join me States as you can tell I am not mayor Enriquez I am filling in as mayor is in Santa Fe um for the next couple of days um also just want to remind my colleagues that because there are only four of us to please remain on

“immigration” is said 3× on the recording and never appears in the minutes

Word never written down

A word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

hour and the posting closes this week this Friday so that one's coming to a close quickly we have a data entry assistant at bayet Incorporated for $15 an hour um closing on the 20th an assistant manager at Panda Restaurant Group um and that one post closes on the 18th that is

~780 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “investigation”, “deportation”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

Ado guess I'll hand it off to you okay next slide please I think we do it here okay I'm we are the next L I'm sorry here we go okay so just uh for everyone's understanding the the alliance for regional military sir I'll just need you close and then state your name for the record yes Gus Rodriguez Alliance for regional military support thank you mayor Pro um The Alliance for regional Military Support its mission is to ensure the uh Fort Bliss Whit SS and hman Air

~780 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “lawsuit”, “lead”, “contamination”, “asbestos”, “cancer”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

connected and one of those as I mentioned is one of those is taking a look at the workforce needs with have various conversations with defense industry Partners on what are some of their needs and how can we connect how can the city connect all of those opportunities for example with New Mexico state or donana Community College to be able to find um you know work for uh individuals that are graduating from from those respective uh educational institutions and uh also taking a look at how we

“asbestos” is said 4× on the recording and never appears in the minutes

Word never written down

A word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

city can connect to what's uh what's what's going on so various meetings with folks in lton as to what they are doing um their aspect of it is not the actual testing component of it but they're the development side and then they send the the the equipment to White Sands to be tested

~650 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “lawsuit”, “investigation”, “misconduct”, “racist”, “cancer”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

that the department opens when when it becomes aware of potential concerns about officer Behavior officer misconduct our job as the slide says is to is to make sure that the cases were complete objective and thorough in terms of the investigation process the legitimacy of the investigation process is a very important part of our uh our mandate here because obviously when the police are in control of these investigations they're they're investigating themselves it's there's kind of some natural skepticism about how seriously that gets taken and whether

“misconduct” is said 9× on the recording and never appears in the minutes

Word never written down

A word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

officer performance and then internally generated com um investigations that the department opens when when it becomes aware of potential concerns about officer Behavior officer misconduct our job as the slide says is to is to make sure that the cases were complete objective and thorough in terms of the investigation process the legitimacy of

~4680 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “lawsuit”, “litigation”, “violation”, “investigation”, “misconduct”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

recruits cheating on some of the the um academic work that the officers are or that the recruits are responsible for as part of that program the department initiated a very thorough and rigorous investigation right away and and um separated several of those folks from the agency as a result of that as far as the external cases were concerned oftentimes it it relates to some dissatisfaction with some aspect of a of a call for service and these can obviously vary uh in a lot of there are

Dr. Earl Nissen: partial match in the recording

Only partly supported

The written version compresses or reshapes what was said. The minutes record Dr. Earl Nissen as having asked these words. 53% of the distinctive wording appears in the recording's captions — the written version may compress or reshape what was said.

What the minutes say

Dr. Earl Nissen, Member of the Public asked during the seven audits, you never dealt with a police shooting incident, have you? Because I would think that as the recent trial, we had of an officer, there was very specific things about the policing that took

What the recording says

to know each other over past few years um then during the seven uh audits uh you never dealt with a police shooting incident have you Dr Nissan just ask all your questions and then we'll have her come up what no we because there's only one microphone Dr niss can you just make your make your comments ask your questions and then we'll have her come up um because I would think that as the recent trial we had of an officer there was

Hear it at 1:13:08Speaker as recorded: Dr. Earl Nissen4 AGENDA ITEM 4.1 THE ALLIANCE FOR REGIONAL MILITARY SUPPORT (ARMS) UPDATE. E

Were you there?

If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.