← All checked meetingsRedline · June 22, 2026
Las Cruces Council Work Session - June 22, 2026
The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 29 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 29 were found in the recording.
Summarised — gaps worth reading. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.
Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026
2 differences
Differences that ordinary summarising does not explain — words nobody said, figures and negations that disagree, vote rolls that don’t add up, and stretches where somebody spoke and went unrecorded. Show all 8 differences
~1300 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 1 person introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “investigation”, “resign”, “lead”, “deportation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
Your life. Well, good afternoon everyone. Welcome to our city council work session. Today is Monday, June 22nd. If you'll all join me, we'll stand and offer a moment of silence for our men and women of the military and our also our brave women and men from the police and fire department that protect our city 24/7 365. If you join me in the pledge. I pledge allegiance to the of the United States of America. And to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God
~650 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 1 person introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “settlement”, “investigation”, “contamination”, “condemnation”, “deportation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
We appreciate all that you do for our community. Thank you, man. Thanks again. It was a pleasure. Thank you. Next is agenda item 1.2. It's the opioid settlement funds. Wes Smith. I'm going to use a script this time so that I don't use any trite expressions. Sir. Wes, I've never heard you say something trite that wasn't awesome. So Go awesome or be really excited about? Uh I was excited about it. So please don't edit those out. Okay. All right. Um good afternoon, Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem
Were you there?
If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.