Perfect World
← Transcript library

Flock Safety Loses Another City After CEO’s Email Backfires

Business Reform291K viewsDec 31, 202519:143,075 words
▶ Watch on YouTube⬇ Download transcript (.txt)

Summary

A neutral AI summary of this video is queued and will appear here.

Full transcript

They say self-inflicted wounds hurt the most. If that's true, Flock Safety must be hurting in places they didn't even know existed after their CEO's unsolicited, overly aggressive email to a Virginia police chief cost them yet another citywide contract just two weeks ago. Stuntton, Virginia has become the latest in a rapidly growing list of cities and counties to terminate their contracts with Flock Safety. These nine cities and counties have all terminated their contracts. So Flock may want to update their website accordingly. Or maybe Flock doesn't need to update their website because according to Eugene, Oregon police chief Chris Skinner, Flock turned a camera back on even after the city ordered Flock to turn them all off. And Eugene, Oregon wasn't alone. Something similar happened in Cambridge, Massachusetts after they canled their Flock contract. As always, links to all my sources can be found in the description. I am Dr. John Padfield, an engineer, former state legislator, and business professor, and this is Business Reform, where business, technology, and society intersect. In this video, I am going to discuss the details of why Stuntton, Virginia Police Chief Jim Williams decided to cancel Flock's contract over quote issues with the ideology of Flock CEO and how you can leverage his decision to encourage your elected officials to do the same. Flock registered with the Georgia Secretary of State in March 2017. For the first several years of their existence, relatively few people had heard of Flock Safety outside of law enforcement and the investor class. According to the Atlanta Community Press Collective, Flock's initial venture capital came largely from members of the so-called PayPal mafia, including Palunteer co-founder Peter Teal. Quote, "Critics termed members of this Silicon Valleybased capital formation the Broligarchy and have accused them of ushering in technofascism through a sweeping crossjurisdictional AI powered police state. According to trends.google.com, google.com. Very few people googled flock safety during their first 5 years of operation, but searches have quadrupled over the past 3 years as some police chiefs have publicly bragged about how people in their cities can't drive anywhere without running into cameras. People became even more concerned recently when police sergeant Jaime Miller used flock cameras to falsely accuse an innocent woman of theft while bragging, "You know, we have cameras in that town. You can't get a breath of fresh air in or out of that place without us knowing." Correct. As more people became aware of Flock's nationwide network of surveillance cameras, they became increasingly concerned about the loss of privacy and the rapid erosion of our Fourth Amendment rights. And please don't let the name flock safety fool you. There is a reason I have always called them flock surveillance. That is because Garrett Langley's company holds a 2022 patent for a quote dynamic surveillance network. Notice it is not a dynamic safety network. It is a dynamic surveillance network. There was no public debate about whether Americans wanted more than 80,000 AI powered surveillance cameras watching and recording everywhere they go. As of September 2025, Garrett Langley had grown his privately held company into a 7.5 billion dollar business, thanks in large part to contracts paid for with our tax dollars before most Americans had ever heard of flock safety. The more the American public learned about Flock surveillance network, the more upset they became at the idea of being tracked everywhere they went. In the 2018 case of Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement must have a warrant to track your location using cell phone data, even when you are moving around in public and even when the data regarding your location is held by a private company. But that didn't stop Flock from selling their surveillance network, which allows law enforcement to bypass the Fourth Amendment. I am one of several privacy advocates who have created and posted well-ressearched videos expressing concern over how Flock is turning America into a surveillance state. Another privacy advocate took a different approach to increase public awareness of Flock's AI powered surveillance cameras. In November 2024, 404 Media ran a story on a brand new website launched by Will Freeman called Deflock.me. Deflock.me MI is an educational website that has mapped the locations of over 70,000 automated license plate readers around the world, but the majority of them are in the United States. These are all the known license plate cameras around central Indiana. And as you continue to zoom in, you realize, as police sergeant Jamie Millerman so eloquently put it, "You can't get a breath of fresh air without us knowing." deflock.me me describes what they do as educating people about what license plate readers are, how they work, and why people should care. They also report and track where these surveillance cameras are located. And they quote, "Encourage communities to stand up against the unchecked spread of these surveillance systems by pushing for greater accountability and stronger privacy protections." What does Flock CEO Garrett Langley think about Deflock me? After having his lawyer send DOC a threatening cease and desist letter, Langley said in an interview with a senior writer at Forbes, "And then unfortunately there's terroristic organizations like Dlock whose primary motivation is chaos. They are closer to Antifa than they are anything else. There's terroristic organizations like Dlock. I'm not sure Dlock would agree with the terroristic uh [laughter] label." I am good friends with the person who wrote the Dlock. me smartphone app, which does not collect any of your data. If you ever met him in person, you would immediately realize just how wrong Garrett Langley was in his statement. Garrett Langley owes everyone involved with Deflock an apology for his outrageous, inflammatory, and in my opinion, defamatory accusation against Dlock. But in a way, I'm thankful for Langley's arrogant, unhinged demonization of everyone opposed to his surveillance network because that attitude is exactly what led Stuntton's police chief, Jim Williams, to cancel Flock's contract. Allow me to explain. Police Chief Williams posted his email exchange with Langley on the city's website, and I have included a link to a PDF of that email exchange in the description of this video. What I am about to show you was only edited for conciseness. On December 8th, 2025, Garrett Langley wrote, "Hi, VA Stuntton PD team. I'm writing to you directly because I want there to be zero confusion about what's happening. Flock has never been hacked ever. Flock is building tools to help you fight the real crime affecting communities across the country. Many activists don't like that. Let's call this what it is. Flock and the law enforcement agencies we partner with are under coordinated attack. The attacks aren't new. You've been dealing with them forever. And we've been dealing with them since our founding from the same activist groups that want to defund the police, weaken public safety, and normalize lawlessness. Now they're producing YouTube videos with misleading headlines. They're also trying to turn a public records process into a weapon against you and against us, Garrett. As I mentioned previously, I have made several videos expressing my concerns about what I see as Fourth Amendment violations from Flock's patented dynamic surveillance network. One of my videos explicitly encouraged viewers to use their state's public records laws to obtain copies of their local law enforcement contracts with Flock and copies of departmental policy and procedure manuals. And I will link that video at the end of this video. I stand by every word I said in that video. In that video, I asked viewers to forward those materials to me so I could use that information in an amicus brief I plan to file when the Institute for Justice's lawsuit against the city of Norfolk over their 170 plus flock cameras goes up on appeal. I have never once called for defunding the police. I am a former Indiana State Representative and I was proud to be endorsed by the Indiana Fraternal Order of Police Pack when I successfully ran for reelection in 1996. I was also happy to provide my expertise and technical assistance to the Marian County Sheriff's Office in 2014 when an IT problem resulted in a series of accidental releases of jail inmates. I helped Sheriff John Leighton fix that problem, then went on to lead two more projects for the Marian County Sheriff's Office. To put it bluntly, Langley's habit of demonizing his critics as being anti-law enforcement is not going to work on me because I have decades of evidence to the contrary. So, what YouTubers were Langley talking about who want to defund the police, weaken public safety, and normalize lawlessness? Was Langley talking about attorney Jeff Hampton or attorney Steve Lato or attorney John Bryan or attorney Andrew Fluchet or the attorneys at the Institute for Justice? I've never once heard Lewis Rossman, Naomi Brockwell, or Johnny B advocate for defunding the police. Does Langley really believe all YouTubers opposed to AI powered surveillance are wanting to normalize lawlessness? And speaking of normalizing lawlessness, the phrase confession through projection keeps coming to my mind. I have never read a single story about deflock.mme breaking a single law anywhere. But I do remember reading about a license plate surveillance startup that broke the law in multiple states. If I recall correctly, that company got in trouble in Florida for setting up nearly 100 cameras without permits and was caught operating illegally in Texas. And it was ordered by a judge to stop putting up cameras in North Carolina. And it violated Illinois law by sharing license plate data with a federal agency. I am the Homelander and I really can do whatever the I want. According to Forbes, local officials in multiple states said that Flock had violated state laws designed to guarantee driver safety. So, who is really weakening public safety and normalizing lawlessness? Confession through projection. Getting back to the emails, on December 12th, Stuntton Police Chief Williams wrote back to Langley, and I have only edited his reply for conciseness. Mr. Langley, thank you for the information regarding the security of Flock ALPR systems. As far as your assertion that we are currently under attack, I do not believe that is so. What we are seeing here is a group of local citizens who are raising concerns that we could be potentially surveilling private citizens, residents, and visitors, and using data for nefarious purposes. These citizens have been exercising their rights to receive answers from me, my staff, and city officials to include our elected leaders. In short, it is democracy in action. Police Chief Williams is quote a proponent of communityoriented policing and believes in order to be effective the police and the community must work together to effectively reduce crime and improve overall quality of life. I could not agree with him more. I am not anti-law enforcement. I am just anti-damic surveillance networks that prevent people from getting a breath of fresh air without the police knowing. According to a December 19 article in the Augusta Free Press, quote, "While a growing number of local residents have been vocal at the city council meetings about their opposition to the cameras, it was the email from the Flock Safety CEO that appears to have been the final straw in the city's decision about the future of ALPR technology." The unsolicited email sent on Monday, December 8th, to Stuntton Police Chief Jim Williams said that Flock and the law enforcement agencies they partner with are undercoordinated attack. The email from CEO Garrett Langley was likely intended to give police departments ammunition to fight back against some of the persistent arguments of opponents of the ALPR technology related to hackability, sharing data, security, and more. However, Stuntton didn't like the picture Langley painted of those who oppose the technology. As one of the YouTubers Langley attempted to demonize and label as anti-law enforcement, I want to personally and sincerely thank police chief Williams and the Stuntton City Council for respecting and defending free speech and civil debate on important and controversial issues. In Langley's response to Chief Williams email just 3 minutes after Chief Williams sent it, Langley complained about how it is tough every day waking up to stories online that are misleading and only represent one side of the story. Excuse me while I wipe away a tear for his tough life. Langley owns a nationwide surveillance network with an estimated value of 7.5 billion. that makes him a part of the surveillance state broligarchy along with Oracle chairman Larry Ellison and Palunteer co-founders Alexander Karp and Peter Teal. Larry Ellison who was briefly the richest man in the world earlier this year said quote we're going to have supervision. Citizens will be on their best behavior because we are constantly recording and reporting everything that is going on. Ellison went on to say, quote, "Artific artificial intelligence will help process the vast amounts of footage recorded by cameras placed on everything from car dashboards and front doors to security systems and cops." And I think that photo demonstrates he has friends in high places who can help him implement his Orwellian nightmare. What is Flock's role in all of this? Ellison said AI will help process the vast amounts of footage recorded by all types of cameras, including front door cameras. Flock just entered into a partnership with Amazon to gain access to video from millions of Ring doorbells across the country. Flock Nova is Flock's AI surveillance system that uses the tagline, "Search once, see everything." Everything now includes tracking you with facial recognition to every house you enter. so Flock can build a database of your known associates. I will have a lot more to say about Flock Nova in an upcoming video. A few weeks ago, Ben Jordan posted this video in which he claims to have hacked 80,000 plus Flock cameras. And in all fairness to Garrett Langley, Ben is probably one of the YouTubers Langley was demonizing in his email to Police Chief Williams. I am a former electrical engineer, but I am not and never have been a hacker. I am not an expert in the shades of gray between network penetration testing and hacking. However, in these two videos, Ben demonstrated to my satisfaction that he was able to gain access to multiple flock cameras and watch a live stream of children playing on a playground. Ben referred to flock cameras as Netflix for stalkers because anyone who knew where to look could watch children on a playground or watch women running by themselves on a trail through a park. On December 3rd, I recorded an interview with Josh Michael, who was one of the security professionals who worked with Ben on his first Flock video. Josh remained anonymous during Ben's video, but he gave me permission to share his face and his name in our interview. The reason I have not posted that video yet is because I wanted to talk to legal counsel before doing so. Josh shared a lot of information with me, including numerous screenshots he took related to Flock Nova while he was inside of Flock servers. I did not want to get Josh in legal trouble for sharing anything that he found during what some people might have called a hack. But Langley himself put my mind at ease. My interview with Josh was on December 3rd, and 5 days later on December 8th, Langley explicitly stated, quote, "Flock has never been hacked. Period. ever. Period. That means nothing Josh shared with me could possibly be the result of a hack because no hack had occurred as of the time of our interview. So look for that video going into detail on what Flock Nova can do in the very near future. I'm sure Ellison Karp Teal and Langley all have the very best of intentions. Unfortunately, as the old saying goes, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. What can you do to help stop Ellison, Karp, Teal, and Langley from fully implementing their dystopian surveillance state? Start by downloading and using the Deflock Me app to report and avoid surveillance cameras with their updated feature that will route you around all known license plate readers. Then go to the description of this video and download the articles about the city's cancelling contracts with Flock. Be sure to download the email exchange between Langley and Chief Williams. Then share all those articles as well as links to this video and Ben Jordan's videos with your city council, county council, mayor, police chief, sheriff, and state legislators. Most, but not all of them will likely ignore you. Don't worry about them. Keep doing your part by sharing the information and letting your elected officials know you don't want every camera in the country connected to an AI to quote supervise us. You can also get your elected officials to knock over the next domino. And every domino that falls makes it easier for the next one to fall. I feel a tipping point coming in 2026. And I am sure Garrett Langley feels it too. That is why he is attempting to demonize people like me and other privacy advocates on YouTube with outrageous claims about us wanting to defund police and quote normalize lawlessness. These are some of my upcoming videos. So, if they are of interest to you, please subscribe and turn on notifications so you don't miss them when they are released. My 2026 Brushfires of Freedom tour kicks off on Friday, January 2nd, at Burnsy's Bar and Grill, just a few miles west of Milwaukee. So, if you live in the area, I hope to see you there. I know it is discouraging when you think about all the money companies like Palunteer, Flock, Oracle, and literally hundreds of others are making tracking our movements, recording what we watch on smart TVs, monitoring our internet browsing, what we purchase, who we call, who we text, etc. But I am not giving up, and I don't want you to give up either. The surveillance state can be stopped if enough of us say no and we're willing to peacefully and legally push back on all the overreaches. I can't wait to read your comments.