Perfect World
← Transcript library

Illegal Surveillance? Illinois Accuses Flock Safety of Breaking the Law #privacy #police #technews

GovernmentTechnology1.3K viewsAug 26, 20251:51328 words
▶ Watch on YouTube⬇ Download transcript (.txt)

Summary

A neutral AI summary of this video is queued and will appear here.

Full transcript

A tech company that helps police solve crimes using automatic license plate readers like these is now being accused by one state of breaking the law by giving surveillance data to US Customs and Border Protection. We are dealing with powerful surveillance technology and it has been abused which is extremely troubling especially as it violates the law. Under a new law in Illinois, once a private company like Flock shares license plate data with law enforcement, it becomes a legally defined user and it's illegal for any user to share data for immigration enforcement or reproductive health investigations. After media reports raised concerns, the Secretary of State's office launched a sample audit reviewing search records from a dozen local agencies using Flock systems. As a result of the audit late last week, we discovered that Flock did not have proper safeguards in place for data sharing. To be honest, it was a surprise when he came out with that uh message yesterday and the way that he did because literally that morning we were on a Zoom call with their office talking about these things and I thought that we were all working together to try to solve the problem um not to cast blame. Flock says it's paused all federal access nationwide, will provide more training, and now flags federal requests with reminders about state law compliance. But the company says it's the local agencies, not Flock, who decide who gets access. At the end of the day, our customers own the data, not Flock. They decide with whom they want to share, not Flock. And um it is not Flock's job to police the police. That is not our job, a private company, to be the regulators of um this industry. This is why we rely on our elected officials. The clash raises a critical question. Who's responsible when powerful surveillance tech is misused? There's much more to this story. We read more at govk.com.