Perfect World
← Transcript library

The Flock Camera Situation is Terrifying

ThatDudeinBlue138K viewsJul 14, 202611:441,958 words
▶ Watch on YouTube⬇ Download transcript (.txt)

Summary

A neutral AI summary of this video is queued and will appear here.

Full transcript

You know, a wise man or well fictional character Ian Malcolm from the classic Jurassic Park once said, "Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think they should." Side note, rest in peace, Sam Neil. That was a bummer. But this line from this movie 30 years ago can apply to a lot of things today, but especially with technology. things like AI, which I have plenty of thoughts on, but the slippery slope of having the power to well have untapped power, something that can be justified in the moment or temporary is never really temporary. This, including the hot topic lately of flock safety and their notorious cameras. Now, I'm typically not a commentator on things of this nature, but it actually affects me in a very direct way. I just got back from doing the Rubicon trail. Thanks, Jeep. Appreciate that. Where I had zero signal the entire time, which was a blessing. But once I got signal, I got sent this article again and again and again. It's an article from the car journalist website, The Drive, previously known as Drive. No disrespect, a synopsis of the article is that the car reviewer Joel was reviewing a very expensive Range Rover. He got tracked by the police using the Flock cameras and then was wrongly accused of stealing the Range Rover. What a day. And since I'm a car reviewer myself, many people seem to take interest of what my opinion on this crazy situation was and how it might affect what other car journalists do in the future or even just the average car guy. Now, with me being here in Georgia, Atlanta has had a not so great spotlight with this whole situation because we have a ton of flaw cameras. And it's been highlighted many, many times that you can simply hack. I use that term extraordinarily lightly because it's so easy that it might as well not be called hacking. You can access these cameras extraordinarily easy. So, in today's unorthodox video, I'm going to be talking about a few things. what happened with the drive and its journalist flux safety and how it kind of relates to the surveillance cameras of the past versus now. Also, the whole speed camera infrastructure and some laughable interview clips from the company that just blow my mind and if we should actually all be worried about this or is this just a big old outrage machine online. So, let's get into it. [music] Anyways, if you don't know the details of the story with the drive, Joel was reviewing a very expensive Range Rover up in Minnesota. It's a lovely state, by the way, but man, they cannot catch a break in the news this past year, [laughter] dude. Joel drives into a Kohl's parking lot and the Plymouth Police Department box him in with four cop cars. They start yelling at him, tell him to get out of the car. And I really can't blame Joel the journalist for being so off-put by this because to him, he's just doing his job. He's just reviewing a car like every other day. And a big part of reviewing a press car is to kind of live normally with it, right? He's just like running errands and stuff of that nature. But he does the right thing. He gets out of the car, puts his hand up, follows the orders, doesn't cause too much of a problem for the cops, obviously, cuz he didn't do anything. And when you see the body cam footage, it's pretty crazy. You and you and the wife. Come on, please. Both of us. Both of them. Yep. Okay. Is this your car? Uh, it's complicated. Can I explain it? You can explain it. Yes. I'm an automotive journalist. Okay. So I write I I'm the director of content product for the drive.com. I'm on a uh media website. That's that's me right there. The reason you have forced here is because your license plate is registered as stolen license [music] plates in our system. Are you serious? I review cars for a living. I fly around the world, review cars. Because, and I quote, "The reason I was IDed as a dangerous car thief was a simple data error made 2,000 m away in California. Creating an edge case within an edge case that Flock's AI camera network was unable to handle. Freaking clankers, dude. What the heck are we going to [laughter] do about this?" The cops then added that the plate was reported stolen by a Jaguar Land Rover dealership in Los Angeles. Car theft in LA. No way, dude. And this is when it gets blatantly obvious that it was an AI error and not just a human error. I quote, "The New Jersey plates that were allegedly stolen from the LA dealer were DTM, not 3410 DTM." But when the police report was created and the plate was entered into Flock, it was just recorded as 34 DTM. just five large characters, no little number in the middle. And Fox AI tech wasn't registering that non-standard little number when it began picking up the Range Rover around town. Aka, it was tracking him everywhere across town. So, when it was going through an intersection, it was getting hit by a flot camera. And that's how the cops were able to find him so fast. It as in the AI just saw 34 DTM in large type and started alerting the local police. Not scary at all. What could possibly go wrong? But of course, amazing technology. So, recap here. Not only could this get you falsely accused using an AI model of stealing somebody's car, the AI doesn't even do the one job it's designed to do. Because we are rushing way too quickly into this kind of technology, like way too fast. I'm also biased because stupid data centers are taking racetracks away. So, there is a little bit of that. Can we just have AI like do the boring stuff like spreadsheets? Please, can we not do this? Just a thought. And stop making AI art and AI music. Please. Side note, I've been teaching myself how to be a music producer and it's made me hate AI even more. But anyway, let's move on. Pseudo producers, boo. Also, to make it even more light-hearted, people take advantage of these cameras and AI algorithms for their own personal reasons. What could possibly go wrong? For example, 10 police officers just got arrested in Atlanta for taking advantage of the flock camera system for their own personal reasons or personal gain. Basically misusing the flaw camera database. Probably looking at people they shouldn't be looking at. This is literally a doorway to crazy people's wonderland. Dude, [laughter] the LAPD, out of all people, abandoned the flock contract. That is saying something. The cameras are mostly peaceful. I swear. While I was digging, I also found this interview that just made me go, "Are you kidding me?" It was a journalist asking one of the tech guys from Flock. I saw the camera literally followed me around. So basically he tested it by walking in front of it, walking back, and it just kept tracking him. Essentially, the guy responds with, "Oh, it's not trained to track people. It's trained to track moving objects." There's an object detection feature that you can set up. It's called guardian mode that allows a camera to just know if there's movement from a person [music] in the screen. It is not tracking where you're going to go, where you're going to leave, or you're going to start and stop. Like, not a crazy take here, but you know what a moving object is? a person walking. Anyways, let's talk about how this affects car people in general or just normal people driving every day. Other countries over the years I have visited, you could argue were a surveillance state. I mean like crazy crazy levels of surveillance. For example, I got a ticket in the mail from a foreign country for 1 kilometer over 1 kilometer and they mailed it to my house. It was more expensive to mail the ticket to my house than give up on a 1 kilometer ticket from a speed camera. So surveillance on cars is nothing new, especially with the speed camera infrastructure around the world. In fact, in Europe, it's way less common to see a cop like on the side of the road getting you with laser or radar. It's just cameras everywhere most of the time. But speed cameras, which I do despise, have a much more simple function, right? Another example is France. In 2018 and 2019, France destroyed, [laughter] by France, I mean citizens, not the police or the military, whoever, just normal average people destroyed 60 to 75% of the speed cameras around the entire country. For context, that's thousands of cameras. It's not like, oh, little Timmy's going over there and spray painting a camera. No, it's the whole country. And I won't be surprised if it starts to ramp up if the whole flux safety thing becomes even more of a hot topic. People are going to do some pretty wild things. I'm not encouraging this though. Like try your very best to go to your city hall and cause a ruckus and demand them to be removed. That is overall on paper the right thing to do. Now, if you're curious, what's my personal take on all of this? This isn't good. [laughter] Period. It's not good. if you can't really see that already. Sure, the cameras suck, but it's more so the AI algorithms that track people and the plates and stuff that seem to be the real problem. That's what I'm not a fan of personally. Cameras do solve crime, but not a hot take here at all, but there's a time and place and a way to use it. A sad example would be what happened at the Boston Marathon all those years ago. Without all the cameras on the street, those perpetrators probably would have gotten away with it. do remember having discussions with people around that time where it opened the door to people's minds saying, "Oh, we just need more. We just need more cameras. We need more surveillance cuz then we just catch everybody, right?" Without kind of talking about the sacrifice that might give in the future when technology gets better, aka AI algorithms. A camera is one thing, a vlog camera is another thing. So, for us who love driving and maybe driving a certain way up in the mountains or something like that, it's going to be even harder for us to well enjoy things. It definitely makes me rethink reviewing cars in certain ways. I definitely don't like it for obvious reasons, but I also made this video as a prompt for discussion. This is not a political video by any means. I don't think this is a controversial take that we really need to think about that we should all collectively be on board with and be on the same team about. I think it's important to have a safe as a society as you can, but there is a certain degree of paranoia and taking advantage of the systems around us that is very scary. So, please down in the comments bevil, like the video. It really helps me out. Once again, thank you all for watching and I'll see you guys next time. Take it easy. [music]