Perfect World
Las Cruces
← All checked meetings

Redline · June 24, 2024

Las Cruces Council Work Session - June 24, 2024

The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 76 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 76 were found in the recording.

Tracks the recording closely. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.

91match score /100
14,116words in the minutes
25,579words on the recording
5,980spoken words with no counterpart

Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026

2 differences

Differences that ordinary summarising does not explain — words nobody said, figures and negations that disagree, vote rolls that don’t add up, and stretches where somebody spoke and went unrecorded. Show all 14 differences

~1040 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 2 people introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “lead”, “contamination”, “cancer”, “condemnation”, “eviction”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

e e e [Music] you're on well good afternoon welcome to the work session today is Monday June 24th 2024 it's approximately 1 p.m. I am mayor Eric Enriquez uh we will start with a moment of silence for the brave men and women of the United States armed forces as they protect our interests around the globe as well as the courageous men and women of the Los Cruses Police Department Los cres fire department as they keep our city safe if you join me in the

Mattiace: figure differs from the recording: minutes say 400000, recording says 400

Says something different

Both records carry the same sentence, but they disagree on a number or on whether it was negative. Both records carry the same sentence, but not the same number. The minutes read “…neighborhood and let's say the homes are 400,000 to 500,000 is there a…” and state 400000; the recording states 400.

What the minutes say

Councilor Mattiace asked I just have a question on values if that has been incorporated into this document and what I am meaning is that if you have a neighborhood and let’s say the homes are $400,000 to $500,000 is there a consideration David, yourself if you could answer? If you put in a smaller unit, let’s say a duplex or a fourplex what happens to the value of those other homes? Does the assessor lower those because of the lower value of something that goes into those, let’s say a gated neighborhood? What happens there and the businesses that come in? I worry about the equity, and it is a little bit of personal agenda because my daughter she just invested in a home by the golf course, and it was pretty expensive. I would just like to see her equity build so that she would have something that is valuable when she is, well she is only 30 years old but maybe it would grow in value when she is 50 and not be a target for less value because of trying to build density.

What the recording says

meaning is if if you have a neighborhood and let's say the homes are $400 $500,000 is there a consideration David or yourself if you could answer if you put in a a smaller unit uh let's say a duplex or a fourplex uh what happens to the value of those other homes are are is is the assessor low of those because of the lower value of something that goes into let's say we allowed in gated neighborhoods um what happens there and and the businesses that come in I I worry about the equity and and and it's a little bit of Personal Agenda because my daughter you know she just invested in a a home up in uh by by the golf course and you know was pretty expensive I would just like to see her Equity buil

Hear it at 1:36:47Speaker as recorded: Mattiace3 AGENDA ITEM 3.1 NEW MEXICO LEGISLATIVE POLICY. B

Were you there?

If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.