Perfect World
Las Cruces
← All checked meetings

Redline · June 24, 2024

Las Cruces Council Work Session - June 24, 2024

The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 76 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 76 were found in the recording.

Tracks the recording closely. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.

91match score /100
14,116words in the minutes
25,579words on the recording
5,980spoken words with no counterpart

Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026

14 differences

Every difference the check found, including ones ordinary summarising explains. Show only the serious ones

~1040 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 2 people introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “lead”, “contamination”, “cancer”, “condemnation”, “eviction”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

e e e [Music] you're on well good afternoon welcome to the work session today is Monday June 24th 2024 it's approximately 1 p.m. I am mayor Eric Enriquez uh we will start with a moment of silence for the brave men and women of the United States armed forces as they protect our interests around the globe as well as the courageous men and women of the Los Cruses Police Department Los cres fire department as they keep our city safe if you join me in the

Mattiace: figure differs from the recording: minutes say 400000, recording says 400

Says something different

Both records carry the same sentence, but they disagree on a number or on whether it was negative. Both records carry the same sentence, but not the same number. The minutes read “…neighborhood and let's say the homes are 400,000 to 500,000 is there a…” and state 400000; the recording states 400.

What the minutes say

Councilor Mattiace asked I just have a question on values if that has been incorporated into this document and what I am meaning is that if you have a neighborhood and let’s say the homes are $400,000 to $500,000 is there a consideration David, yourself if you could answer? If you put in a smaller unit, let’s say a duplex or a fourplex what happens to the value of those other homes? Does the assessor lower those because of the lower value of something that goes into those, let’s say a gated neighborhood? What happens there and the businesses that come in? I worry about the equity, and it is a little bit of personal agenda because my daughter she just invested in a home by the golf course, and it was pretty expensive. I would just like to see her equity build so that she would have something that is valuable when she is, well she is only 30 years old but maybe it would grow in value when she is 50 and not be a target for less value because of trying to build density.

What the recording says

meaning is if if you have a neighborhood and let's say the homes are $400 $500,000 is there a consideration David or yourself if you could answer if you put in a a smaller unit uh let's say a duplex or a fourplex uh what happens to the value of those other homes are are is is the assessor low of those because of the lower value of something that goes into let's say we allowed in gated neighborhoods um what happens there and and the businesses that come in I I worry about the equity and and and it's a little bit of Personal Agenda because my daughter you know she just invested in a a home up in uh by by the golf course and you know was pretty expensive I would just like to see her Equity buil

Hear it at 1:36:47Speaker as recorded: Mattiace3 AGENDA ITEM 3.1 NEW MEXICO LEGISLATIVE POLICY. B

“noncompliance” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes

Word never written down

A word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

that you see listed here which is Criminal competency uh potential amendments to the assisted Outpatient Treatment act and statute for essentially civil commitment for non-compliance with treatment uh felon in possession of a firearm and then also a possible uh statutory change for a panhandling or an obstruction of traffic statute um since we

~520 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

able to keep that extended throughout all of phase two so that's been kind of the the tradeoff for the open house at the beginning of the process but since that time uh more recently we have posted um a earlier working draft that's the dated um March 13th draft we posted that Draft online and we did receive some um comments on that there were more than 200 comments that's the screenshot that you see on the right side here of people who reviewed the draft or at

~260 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

you have a home and you have a a small farm you're keeping animals you're raising bees or something in addition to your single family home that's always permitted as long as it meets the city's chapter 7 code about um animal raising restricts the the number of animals that you can have based on your lot size and things like that so that's more about the the nuisances side and then the other animal raising General agriculture um that's more for the smaller midsize Farms where it's not in

“Sarah Rainey” introduces themselves on the recording and is not named in the minutes

Speaker not named

Someone gave their name on the recording and is nowhere in the minutes. Someone identified themselves by name during the meeting — usually a member of the public taking the microphone — but that name appears nowhere in the written record. Caption spellings of names are unreliable, so confirm against the recording before relying on this.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

of the week we have Sarah rainy good afternoon good afternoon thank you so much all right my name is Sarah Rainey I am the One-Stop coordinator for the southwest region of the New Mexico connections um we are for the for the jobs of the week sorry I'm running crazy today there's a lot going on we have have

Hear it at 5:44Speaker as recorded: Sarah Rainey

“Amy De Felix” introduces themselves on the recording and is not named in the minutes

Speaker not named

Someone gave their name on the recording and is nowhere in the minutes. Someone identified themselves by name during the meeting — usually a member of the public taking the microphone — but that name appears nowhere in the written record. Caption spellings of names are unreliable, so confirm against the recording before relying on this.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

you sir next we have pets of the week uh Amy du fix hello everyone of course my name is Amy De Felix I'm one of the rescue coordinators for the Animal Services Center of the msia valley and I always pick and present the pets of the week we always start off with our cat of the week this

Hear it at 7:40Speaker as recorded: Amy De Felix

~1040 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “resign”, “harassment”, “immigration”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

L crues that appear in the municipal code it's an EXA it's an execution tool that cles for future and policies and future development of elevate Los cruus comprehensive plan the Land Development code with u major revisions and updates and incorporate our zoning codes our Maps our subdivision code our design standards the uh status reports uh and next steps will be discussed today with our consultant in this work session and the city uh uh draft of the draft codes and the city council uh feedback and next

~910 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “falsify”, “investigation”, “cancer”, “immigration”, “deportation”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

you'll see the blue circles um those are the neighborhood centers that were identified in Elevate the blue circles that are here are not necessarily intended to be the specific locations but more just general guidance about where they might be appropriate and so our recommendation for approaching the neighborhood centers was to consider them as a um permitted use type so that way they could be allowed by su rather than requiring a rezoning so just to help streamline the process and and help it be a little bit

~1300 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “lawsuit”, “investigation”, “cancer”, “deportation”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

in nh1 and nh2 entirely and did change in H3 to require an Su um and there's another list here of about um 20 I guess 18 more uses here where we made some adjustments in what's allowed where and whether it's by ride or by su the next one is moving into the subdivision regulations um this one again is is another clarification um item in the substantial completion policy we did make an edit to clarify that if you meet the requirements for substantial completion that not only

“Steve Monz Um” introduces themselves on the recording and is not named in the minutes

Speaker not named

Someone gave their name on the recording and is nowhere in the minutes. Someone identified themselves by name during the meeting — usually a member of the public taking the microphone — but that name appears nowhere in the written record. Caption spellings of names are unreliable, so confirm against the recording before relying on this.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

pays for it thank you thank you good afternoon mayor and Council thank you for this opportunity my name is Steve monz um I was a part I was a part of the uh one of the subcommittees economic development during Elevate Los Cruses uh I also spent the last four years on uh the Planning and Zoning Commission in

Hear it at 2:00:58Speaker as recorded: Steve Monz Um

“Lisa Parrot Uh” introduces themselves on the recording and is not named in the minutes

Speaker not named

Someone gave their name on the recording and is nowhere in the minutes. Someone identified themselves by name during the meeting — usually a member of the public taking the microphone — but that name appears nowhere in the written record. Caption spellings of names are unreliable, so confirm against the recording before relying on this.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

government we know better so shut up and take it thank you his ju Garcia good afternoon my name is Lisa Parrot uh what I have not heard the words said today was free enterprise if a person wants to live next to a dispensary let them if a person wants to live in a Suburban home with a yard

Hear it at 2:15:30Speaker as recorded: Lisa Parrot Uh

“Nicole Petes” introduces themselves on the recording and is not named in the minutes

Speaker not named

Someone gave their name on the recording and is nowhere in the minutes. Someone identified themselves by name during the meeting — usually a member of the public taking the microphone — but that name appears nowhere in the written record. Caption spellings of names are unreliable, so confirm against the recording before relying on this.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

HPC needs to be at this table thank you very much thank you hello mayor city council my name is Nicole Petes I am the executive officer of the Los Cris home builders um first and foremost I want to say we are not here to oppose the realized Las Cruis plan we are just here to clarify some of

Hear it at 2:20:10Speaker as recorded: Nicole Petes

~910 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “investigation”, “contamination”, “condemnation”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

by the public that was for a new Fire Station Number Nine the continuation of the East Mesa Public wreck complex affordable housing and park improvements for fire station number nine the construction documents have been completed where at 100% and currently the project is out to bid once the bidding is completed within 2 weeks we will go into those negotiations and we're estimating starting construction about midt if you see the construction schedule down below it does show that we are on track to having the facility built

Were you there?

If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.