Dog parks
Dog-park siting and conditions, pressed by the Las Cruces Dog Park Coalition on questions of ADA slope and plant safety.
The timeline
- April 17, 2025Half the city's playgrounds are past their lifespan — and Council has not agreed to fund the fix
Director Steven Bingham told a four-member board the city has 64 playgrounds, 32 of them 20 years or older against a typical life expectancy of 18 to 22 years, and that the recommendation is to replace five per year rather than bond for all 32 at once. Three of this year's five are being installed at East Mesa, Pioneer and Vlachakis; Apodaca and Young Park are in design. City Council has yet to agree to fund and continue that replacement.
- January 16, 2025Villa Mora Dam Park approved; two years of dog park rules finally land
Six of seven board members met at City Hall and approved a design concept for a new neighborhood park on the old Villa Mora check-dam site. Staff reported the dog park rules had finished a two-year review, and a member of the public asked the board to raise the pickleball attendance cap at Meerscheidt from 44 to about 50.
- December 19, 2024The board endorses park dedication — developers build the park, no reimbursement
Six of seven members endorsed the parks section of Realize Las Cruces, the first update to the City's development code since 2001. It would require developers to build a neighborhood park at their own cost with no reimbursement — a mechanism Las Cruces has never used — and, unlike impact fees, it can raise the level of service rather than just hold it.
- September 19, 2024Dog park rules get teeth after attacks at Hermosa — and a 70% veto clause
Staff brought the board a rewritten set of dog park rules, prompted by what the record calls a lot of dog attacks at Hermosa Park, and said that if 70% or more of the community is against them Parks and Rec would return to the drawing board. The board took no action items, and no one spoke at public participation.
- April 18, 2024Park rangers, $2.55 million for two parks, and half the playgrounds over 20 years old
Director Steven Bingham laid out a budget request built on four priorities, including bringing back park rangers as Police Aides to monitor the skate park and higher-crime areas. Staff also presented the near-final Grindline design for the new skate park at the East Mesa Sports Complex and a ten-year wayfinding signage plan that will do ten parks at a time.
- November 16, 2023Two vacant seats, one subcommittee paused, and December cancelled
With Districts 1 and 5 vacant and District 3 absent, the board voted to delay the community outreach subcommittee's report until it has a full board, cancelled the December meeting for want of action items, and tabled the dog park rules to January 18, 2024. The sports field usage committee created in October has not met yet.
- Motion passed — Table this discussion until the January 18, 2024 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting.
- October 19, 2023A subcommittee on who gets the fields — and a new chair
The board voted to form a subcommittee to analyze how the City uses its sports fields for youth, and named Board Member Coppedge to chair it, after he raised locked gates, contention between the school district and the Parks Department, and unanswered questions about who owns, rents and pays for the fields. The same meeting elected Fred Raish Chair and Laura Haas Vice-Chair as Cassie McClure ended six years of service.
- July 20, 2023A $27.5 million Parks budget, five new full-time positions, and no public comment
Staff presented the FY24 Parks and Recreation budget: $19,442,397 in the General Fund and $27,464,154 in total once special revenue, legislative funding, grants and capital projects are added. The board also heard a 4th of July recap estimating 7,000 people at the parade and 20,000 on the NMSU campus, and was told a Parks and Recreation director has been recommended from outside the City.
- April 20, 2023A fee schedule passes by acclamation with its language still to be written
The board approved the 2023-2024 Fees and Charges and Facility Use Policy "with language added regarding bathroom use and field rental process" — language that did not yet exist when the vote was taken. A motion to table the item to May died, and the reason given on the record was that the policy is already in the queue for City Council in May. Public Participation: "There was none."
- March 16, 2023A finished dog park nobody can open, and a maintenance bill nobody budgeted
Two members of the public pressed the board on the Rinconada dog park, built but padlocked because it cannot be accepted separately from the Animal Services Center. Staff walked through an FY24 budget request that includes three new positions and over $750,000 in vehicles and equipment, and a board member asked why new facilities keep coming online without a maintenance component. The parks deputy director answered with the count: 50 full-time staff for roughly 148 park areas, 60 playgrounds, 40 miles of trails and 33 ballfields.
- August 16, 2022The board kills the Veterans Park renaming on purpose — tabled indefinitely so no precedent attaches
The Veterans Advisory Board's vice-chair asked for one more delay, then said the group is not so much seeking a name change as a change in the park's usage. The board tabled the item indefinitely, with a member stating on the record that a vote would set a precedent against any future renaming. Staff separately disclosed that the Assistant City Manager had stopped permitting Veterans Memorial Park as of August 12.
- July 21, 2022Veterans want a designation, not a playground — and the director tables the name change to go ask them why
The board tabled the renaming of Veterans Memorial Park to August after the Parks & Recreation director said she had not been part of the earlier conversations and wanted to put questions to the Veterans Advisory Board first. The Veterans Advisory Board's vice-chair told the board the group wants a special-use designation rather than a name change. Three of seven seats were filled.
- May 26, 2022"Next week he will file a discrimination thing with the City"
A former board member told the board that disabled veterans cannot use the Apodaca pickleball courts because there is no restroom and an 8.1% grade, that he would file a discrimination complaint the following week, and that the city wastes roughly a third of its GO Bond money by issuing RFPs instead of bidding work. The board then approved a $8,000 crosswalk-art project whose preparations had already begun and whose press release had already gone out.
- April 21, 2022Cricket players, dog walkers and a shooting club fill the room
A three-member board with four vacant seats took eight public speakers, then approved the 2021/2022 fees and facility use policy, master plans for Branigan, Gomez and Frenger parks, and the final design for the Pioneer Women's Park gazebo. Staff confirmed Frenger Pool is proposed for removal and would not pass inspection if the new 50-meter pool were online.
- January 20, 2022Four members, no public, and 74 pages of attachments
The board met at City Hall with four of seven seats filled and approved the minutes of July 15, 2021 — the meeting before it. Staff briefed it on the Go Bond program, a 50-meter competition pool at 15% complete, a special-projects spreadsheet, and a fees-and-charges red line the board will take public input on next month.
- June 17, 2021"It should be called The Nevada Chicane Corridor" — a project closeout, failed pond aerators, and elections postponed
Public Works Director David Sedillo presented the closing of the Nevada Avenue Cool Corridor and was told by a member of the public that the project increases heat and should not carry the name. Staff reported that the Young Park pond aerators were removed in May as irreparable and a replacement system is on order. The board tabled its Chair and Vice Chair elections to July, saying it wanted a full complement first.
- May 20, 2021"The City of Las Cruces basically has blatantly lied" — a Cool Corridor complaint, and a $2.4 million parking lot
The board met by Zoom webinar with five of seven seats present and no action items on the agenda. A member of the public told the board the Nevada Cool Corridor's costs had grown past what the city stated and that 60% of its plant life had been replaced; the director said she would bring back a full report on the project. Consultants presented a 95%-complete design for the Veterans Memorial Park parking lot and pavilion.
- March 18, 2021Fifty staff to fifty-seven, and acres added every year: the maintenance math
Held via Zoom webinar. Staff presented the maintenance impact of adding a new facility, reporting parks staffing has gone from 50 to 57 since 2008 while eight positions lost in the recession were never recovered. A second presentation covered splash pad water systems, including that a splash pad costs about $550,000 and that the city's one flow-through pad uses over 2.5 million gallons a year. Capital projects presented total just over $24 million.
- February 18, 2021GO Bond program at 26% on time, and the District 5 park gets a number: $675,000
Held via Zoom webinar. Public Works reported the GO Bond park program is 26% on time and 32% on cash, with Apodaca courts due in May and demolition started at Young Park. Staff said the new District 5 park has a funding source of approximately $675,000 from the Philippou settlement. Board members reported that three City Councilors each described the resolution as a one-off.
- November 19, 2020A resident asks where $2.2 million went, and the board gets the whole budget — an $18 million department with closed facilities
Meeting by Zoom with all Parks & Recreation facilities closed under the Public Health Order, the board heard a resident question the accounting on the Nevada Cool Corridor and got the Public Works director's answer on the record. Staff then walked the board through the entire FY21 budget — $11 million in general fund, a little over $18 million in total. The board approved two youth-painted murals and cancelled its own December meeting.
- August 20, 2020Two dozen players write in against the 45-minute court rule — and the board takes no action
The board met on Zoom with no action items on its agenda while a court reservation policy taking effect four days later drew about two dozen emailed public comments, printed in full across pages 11 to 49 of this document. The Chair read the emails aloud; the board took no vote on the policy, and the Director committed to answering every writer individually within 48 hours.
- August 20, 2020The same meeting, filed without the emails: ten pages that say the Chair read them
This is the city's ten-page filing of the August 20, 2020 board meeting — the minutes with no attachments. It records that the Chair read all emails submitted about the pickle ball and tennis scheduling change, that the board took no action on the policy, and that the Director committed to answering every writer within 48 hours. The emails themselves are in the other filing of the same meeting.
- August 4, 2020Two GO bond dog parks voted to Council before the public comments arrived
A special Zoom meeting of the board took presentations on the Burn Lake and Rinconada dog parks, funded from the 2018 GO bond, and moved both to City Council on unanimous votes. The two emailed public comments in the record are timestamped 5:58 and 6:00 p.m. — after both motions carried — and are appended to the minutes as a note.
- Motion carried unanimously — Accept the proposal and pass on to City Council the Burn Lake Dog Park Go Bond Project.
- Motion carried unanimously — Accept the proposal for Rinconada Dog Park and move it forward to City Council to take into considerations brought up by the Board.
- February 20, 2020"Just putting another band aid" — tennis and pickleball push back on the GO Bond court plan
The first presentation of the GO Bond sports court rehabilitation to the board drew sustained objection from tennis and pickleball players, who said earlier meetings had led them to expect full resurfacing and professional-grade courts rather than crack repair. The board tabled the action to a special meeting and asked for two revisions — one with as much professional grade as possible, one showing what the existing money buys. A parent also told the board a discrimination complaint he filed in December 2018 was still unresolved.